Obeying The Law Essay

A mixer structure is mandatory for the survival of universe. Mans inborn parity for evil and conflict has been around since the dawn of time until format was thoroughly-kept finished the introduction of justnesss. With forth fairness, the integrity and stability of nightspot would diminish completely. As a strong advocate of determinism, Thomas Hobbes believes that a strict political science is the exactly commission to social stability.Hobbes believed that a state of nature one with forth a skeletal frame of government would essentially be a contend of all against all. This demeanor would hardly be worth living collectible to the inherent evil nature of some human beings selfishness, desperation and esurience ar the factors that define the war of all against all state. Hobbes thought that sight imparting violently compete in order to secure the fundamental necessities of life or for material gains that people would compete and challenge a nonher(prenomin al)s out of fear to ensure psycheal safety and to earn a glorify reputation so as to deter others from challenging us.Without some build of leadership, fairnesss and government every(prenominal)one would be in a state of global danger dominated by fear. Even those who arent selfish or chickenhearted those who are inherently straightforward would be welcome selfishly and cowardly in order to secure their safety. They would have no problem, for example, attacking a strength threat if it would earn them a reputation of someone who shouldnt be messed with. In the words of Hobbes the wickedness of bad men also compels good men to have recourse, for their own protection, to the virtues of war, which are violence and fraud.Laws have arisen in guild as a way for the government to take temper to prevent negative behaviour from citizens in a society. Many behaviours have had a negative stigma associated with them collectable to religious beliefs and historically, jurisprudence s were introduced as a means of preventing this unwanted, unimaginable behaviour. Issues of the past, no matter how unnecessary they whitethorn sound, constitute a problem at one designate or other and were dealt with the introduction of justices. Ancient Babylons earliest fairness was a ingenuous philosophy an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth. Roman laws consisted of such things as Whenever someone makes a formal promise or sells property, then consort to law, that promise must be carried out or if anyone singsabusive songs active somebody else, he shall be put to death.Another law was to a greater extent conditional If anyone rises somebody elses offset and does not apologize, then the other man can break the first mans limb in return. This law was conditional base on an apology. A similar lawful code was first introduced for the whole Roman Empire and issues were dealt with through lawyers and a judge Canadian legal code is loosely based on these principles. E ven today, there are some ridiculous laws that whitethorn seem unnecessary in Canada, such as You cant drag a deathly horse down Yonge St. on a Sunday or having the colour of house and garage doors being correct by city bylaws. Both those laws seem irrelevant to societal norms in Canada, but they posed a threat at one point or another.Laws are fundamental means of protection and ownership for everyone inwardly society. They enforce fair and equal treatment of all citizens in society. The intention of the law is to ensure that there is fairness to all and justice. Justice is further achieved through equal treatment to every member in society and that is why there are strict laws with the punishment for each horror being the same. If punishments varied for two murderers who commit the exact same form of murder then one of them would be done an injustice something which is unacceptable in society. The law must treat every group and every individualist equally to maintain order in society.As well as maintaining order, the law and the equivalent punishments for breaking it have legion(predicate) purposes. For a start, the main purpose of the law is the remove the dangerous person the deplorable from society. Removing the wrongdoer not only ensures the safety of individuals in society, but it, in a sense, gain a linees the offender a lesson. An optimistic view is that the offender will realize that they have been caught and will learn that they can no all-night get away with that particular form of crime. This, of course, is rarely the case. The view of the offender is commonly that Ive been caught I have to be more careful. This is where the neighboring benefit of the punishment comes in. In cases such as homicide or forms of sadistic violence the point of punishment is an effort to rehabilitate the offender to teach the offender that what they did was wrong not because they got caught, but because many another(prenominal) people were unnatural by it and it is an unacceptable way tobehave in society.Dangerous offender legislation is a prime example of the benefits of rehabilitation. Its goal is to keep anyone deemed a Dangerous Offender, usually the sickest, most sadistic and twisted criminals, imprisoned until they suggest psychological improvement regardless of their sentence. A third goal of the law is to deter individuals from committing crime. That is, regular citizens will realize that there are relentless penalties for committing a crime and that getting caught is very common and therefore try that committing a crime is too risky and not commit it. wicked punishments are required in conjunction with common arrest pass judgment in order to effectively deter potential criminals.Children are socialised to pursue the law from a very young age. Parents are trustworthy for(p) for teaching pincerren rules and moral philosophy which they must obey. This is the same principle as the law. If a child breaks a rule, t hat child is punished. If a person breaks a law, that person is punished. When children are old enough to break the law and be punished for it, they cope what is rightfulness and wrong due to moral guidance. Even those without natural intuition of what is right or wrong Natural Law know not to break the law due to the punishments they endured as a child for breaking rules.Being obedient of the law is something that is required of all citizens, not only because of the consequences that follow, but because of the societal order that is maintained by having everyone obey the law. If one person gets away with breaking the law, no matter how minuscule the punishment may be, other people will get the theory that this law is not enforced or that is very easy to get away with and continue to break it. A prime example of this is seen with hemp legislation. Many people have smoked, or continue to smoke cannabis regularly, making it more common and therefore more acceptable in society . Although society appears to accept it more, it doesnt mean that marijuana isnt noxious or detrimental to a persons well-being. Various drugs could potentially be argued as a lifestyle choice and left up to the individual using them, but this is not the way society should be governed.Laws are imposed for a reason and drugs are illegal because they deadening the user, even if its willfully. There is no way to govern responsible drug use, especially when it comes to operatingvehicles. Breaking any law has an boilersuit negative effect on society. Stealing from even the largest store, such as Wal-Mart, will have a negative effect on everyone. not only does the owner of the store lose their merchandise, money and time, those who shop at Wal-Mart may experience a surge in prices on the stolen item.This is due to the owner needing to make up for the lost profit of the stolen goods. Some may follow the principle that one person committing an action such as detaching has no detrimental effect, but if everyone followed that principle, the store would go out of business due to theft and all the good Samaritans who didnt steal and paid for their goods would again be losing out for something they had nothing to do with. Those laws which are no daylong necessary will phase out of law naturally, such as it being illegal to drag a dead horse down Yonge St. on a Sunday no longer posing a problem in Canada.If Canada were to suddenly remove its government, society would be in a chaotic state. People would be unaffixed to loot, plunder, kill and perform reckless acts with no one to stop them. Everyones rights would essentially be taken away. No one would have the right to life. This poses yet another dubiousness is it ever okay to break the law? Take the scenario of a starving mother who must steal to nourishment her family. In this case, it may seem okay to break the law. But this is only because this mother cannot support her family and essentially they are being deni ed the right to life guaranteed to them by law. This situation seems rather paradoxical, as she is breaking the law to defend the law. In times of desperation, where the most basic human right is being denied or impaired, it is okay to break the law. When survival is necessary, any human would break the law as is the case of self-defense scenarios. This is why sentencing is flexible. While the law is very strict, the sentencing may be lowered on conditions such as why the crime was committed and the situation of the criminal.A final question to pose is does the law provide justice? Justice is defined as the principle of moral rightness equity. But the problem with this definition is that morals are commonly subjective by person. Obviously, there are many things that are objectively wrong including murder, but there are many moral grey spots. Based upon who is asked, speeding on thehighway may be a taboo to one person, but be short okay to another. Its safe to say that justice is the act of maintaining order in a way that benefits and affects everyone in the same way in regards to law. Laws that put restrictions on a specific group or individual are not just because they limit the rights of certain individuals. According to this principle, the law is just. It maintains order in society while treating all individuals equally without annex to their sex, age, ethnicity and/or cultural and religious beliefs. So long as the law treats everyone equally, including those in power, the law can be considered just.The law is a major(ip) part of society that is used to maintain order. Before the imposition of a leader and specific guidelines, society was in a state of crazy house no one was protected and everyone lived in a state of universal insecurity. With the introduction of a legal system and laws, society has been governed in a peaceful way and criminals have traditionally been dealt with in a way that was accepted by all members of society. Even ancient societ ies, such as the Babylonians and the Romans used laws to sustain order and to ensure that justice was done. The law has been, and will continue to be an essential part of all societies. Without a legal system, the value of society would be reduced to nothingness and the integrity of humans would be absent from the world.